Mar 05, 2015 · Our new survey (paper coming soon!) found that 65.5 percent of respondents are still using a VPN to access their network versus 18.5 percent that are using Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) or Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI), who are able to access their entire desktop image on any device.
Jul 20, 2008 · Again, OpenVPN doing SSL for site-to-site VPN is really a special case, and I doubt anyone even consider that when they start comparison SSL VPN products. When you compare OpenVPN as an "SSL VPN" from the client-server viewpoint, to products like Cisco AnyConnect, or Juniper Secure Access, or FortiGate's SSL VPN offering (and a variety of other Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Citrix Gateway, AppGate, Symantec VIP Access Manager and Peplink SpeedFusion, whereas Pulse Connect Secure is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Citrix Gateway, SonicWall SMA, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Microsoft Intune. See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Pulse Connect Secure report. + Cisco CCNA – IPSec VPN vs SSL VPN Remote Access VPN allows teleworkers (mobile workers) to connect securely to the Head Office over Internet. It’s a very cost effective and efficient solution for providing secure access to resources such as business applications to the mobile workers. Apr 19, 2019 · HTTPS and VPNs do similar things in different ways, so it’s understandable why some people confuse the two. Both are tools used to protect internet users and their privacy, but luckily, when it comes to HTTPS vs. VPN, you can easily use both. Mar 05, 2015 · Our new survey (paper coming soon!) found that 65.5 percent of respondents are still using a VPN to access their network versus 18.5 percent that are using Desktop-as-a-Service (DaaS) or Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI), who are able to access their entire desktop image on any device.
As a result, organizations that use IPsec VPNs need to set up and configure multiple VPNs to allow for different levels of access. And some users may need to log into more than one VPN in order to perform their jobs. In contrast, SSL VPNs are easier to configure for individualized access control.
As VPNs in general become a much larger part of corporate and educational environments, simplifying and expanding the ease of use will become paramount. SSL VPN’s are useable by people with little to no computer literacy, are accessible from within any modern personal computer or device, and can be configured to be as secure as the IPSEC VPN protocol that preceded it. Re: Client VPN - L2TP vs SSL @cmr I've been impressed by it at customers who've had Sophos fw. Very easy to use, and the client has a nice traffic light icon that makes it relatively clear if you're connected or not.
If your concern is with security I would say ditch the VPN and go with HTTPS (just make sure there's no regulatory reason you're supposed to be on a VPN). Is HTTPS less secure than a SSL VPN, I would say no if the webserver is configured properly and your machines are patched and up to date. (Not using any crap ciphers (ex SHA1).
Jan 16, 2019 · That really depends on the security built into the sites you’re visiting. Consider Virtual Private Network (VPN) and SSL / TLS certificates. What are the risks of using public Wi-Fi to connect to your company’s network? For a properly configured website with SSL / TLS certificates, the risks to the user are minimal. @Strukt: no. SSL is the door, VPN is the contents of the house. You don't get one or the other; they are not to be opposed. SSL is a technology that ensures some security properties, which are a nice building block for a variety of usages, one of them being "a VPN". SSL-VPN is quite popular to enable staff or partners located outside the corporate network, to access internal apps; mostly internal web apps (more is possible), all done securely through encryption in the web browser. SSL-VPN also goes way further into the application layer, including authentication and access control, than IPSec ever could.